Most Sherman tanks had 75mm and 76mm cannons that usually failed to penetrate the thick front armor of panzers such as the Panther or Tiger tanks at most ranges, whereas German 75mm or 88 mm cannons could penetrate the thinner armor of Sherman tanks from the front at long ranges.
Armored Thunderbolt : the U.s. Army Sherman in World War Ii
The sense of being outgunned and vulnerable led many U. My gunner fired at least six more rounds at the vehicle hitting it from turret to the track. This German tank, knowing that I possibly would be supported by a tank destroyer, started to pull away. I was completely surprised to see it moving after receiving seven hits from my gun.
That sense of confidence and complacency among senior Allied commanders only began to change during the Battle of the Bulge in Dec. This has been denied, explained away and hushed up, but the men who are fighting our tanks against much heavier, better armored and more powerfully gunned German monsters know the truth. It is high time that Congress got at the bottom of a situation that does no credit to the War Department. Why did the U. Soldiers of the 55th Armored Infantry Battalion and tank of the 22nd Tank Battalion, move through smoke filled street.
Wernberg, Germany. Credit: Pvt. First, U. The doctrine suggested that U. That institutional attitude was biased against creating U. Army belatedly equipped some with more powerful guns. The U. By comparison, the Germans, British and Soviets all developed a second class of heavier infantry-support tanks separate from the first class of cavalry tanks. Such infantry-support tanks, such as the German Tiger tanks, required heavier armor to survive direct assaults against enemy defenses consisting of anti-tank guns. At the same time, the U. Both the German Panther and Tiger tanks were developed as part of an arms race against new generations of Soviet tanks such as the excellent T The latter also represented the most widely-produced tank of the entire war.
The Soviets did share intelligence on the new German tanks with the U.
- Stuttering Sammie: Im just like you, I just repeat some letters or words when I talk.;
- Hugo Loves Chocolate.
- Confessions Of An Internet Dater.
- Write Your Way To Freelance Success - Vol. 2 (Writing Lab News).
But U. For a lesson in what the U. The British wisely developed more powerful anti-tank guns and also created a new version of their own Sherman tanks, nicknamed the Firefly, with a more powerful gun to deal with the German Panthers and Tigers prowling Western Europe.
Much of this scramble was too little, too late, as Zaloga describes it. Insights such as this are throughout the book, making it a very interesting read for even those reasonably well versed in the history of the Second World War. The general conclusion? However, the book provides an excellent explanation of ALL the strengths and weaknesses of this tank, as well as the reason these conditions came to exist. This makes the book more nuanced than some will appreciate, perhaps, but it makes the book a very worthwhile read for those who wish to understand this tank?
One of the author? There are essentially no references in the text, aside from the identification of quoted individuals.
Armored Thunderbolt: The U.S. Army Sherman in World War II
The author provides a good bibliographic essay that would assist those seeking to replicate his research, but precise indication of his references will not be found anywhere. Photo credits are also a little loose, with non-credited photos coming from the US Army, while credited photos having a more specific source, although seldom specific enough for the photo in question to be found without a lot of effort on the part of a researcher.
As the bibliographic essay makes clear, there are vast amounts of material on this topic in various archives, principally NARA. This book does not provide researchers with much direct assistance. However, since the vast majority of readers will take Zaloga at his word? There have been many books discussing the Sherman since the end of the Second World War.
This one volume is as good a summary of all aspects of this tank as can be found anywhere, and has photos that are the best cross-section of any in print, period.
“Good Enough” Tanks Won WWII - Lovesick Cyborg : Lovesick Cyborg
Those with any interest in this tank are recommended to get this book. For full posting functionality, view this post in our forum. Armor expert Steven Zaloga answers that question by recounting the Sherman's combat history. Focusing on Northwest Europe but also including a chapter on the Pacific , Zaloga follows the Sherman into action on D-Day, among the Normandy hedgerows, during Patton's race across France, in the great tank battle at Arracourt in September , at the Battle of the Bulge, across the Rhine, and in the Ruhr pocket in He lives near Baltimore, Maryland.
Reviews Review Policy. Published on. Original pages. Best For. Web, Tablet. Content Protection. Flag as inappropriate. It syncs automatically with your account and allows you to read online or offline wherever you are. Please follow the detailed Help center instructions to transfer the files to supported eReaders. More related to World War II. See more. Pat Ware. Pat Ware's new history of this remarkable tank covers in detail its design and development, its technical specifications and the many variants that were produced, and he reviews its operational role in conflicts across the world.
While the Sherman outclassed the older German tanks it encountered when it was first put into combat in , it was vulnerable to the later German medium and heavy tanks, the Panther and the Tiger I and Tiger II. Yet, as Pat Ware shows, the Sherman was more effective than these superior German tanks because it was cheaper to build, reliable, easy to maintain and produced in such large numbers. Pat Ware's expert account of this remarkable fighting vehicle is accompanied by a series of colour plates showing the main variants of the design and the common ancillary equipment and unit markings.
His book is an essential work of reference for enthusiasts. Tank Warfare on the Eastern Front Schwerpunkt. Robert Forczyk. The German panzer armies that swept into the Soviet Union in were an undefeated force that had honed their skill in combined arms warfare to a fine edge. The Germans focused their panzers and tactical air support at points on the battlefield defined as Schwerpunkt - main effort - to smash through any defensive line and then advance to envelope their adversaries.
Initially, these methods worked well in the early days of Operation Barbarossa and the tank forces of the Red Army suffered defeat after defeat. Although badly mauled in the opening battles, the Red Army's tank forces did not succumb to the German armoured onslaught and German planning and logistical deficiencies led to over-extension and failure in In the second year of the invasion, the Germans directed their Schwerpunkt toward the Volga and the Caucasus and again achieved some degree of success, but the Red Army had grown much stronger and by November , the Soviets were able to turn the tables at Stalingrad.
Robert Forczyk's incisive study offers fresh insight into how the two most powerful mechanized armies of the Second World War developed their tactics and weaponry during the critical early years of the Russo-German War. He uses German, Russian and English sources to provide the first comprehensive overview and analysis of armored warfare from the German and Soviet perspectives.
His analysis of the greatest tank war in history is compelling reading. Ian Baxter. With extensive text and in-depth captions with many rare and unpublished photographs it describes the fighting tactics, the uniforms, the battles and the different elements that went into making the Waffen-SS such an elite fighting unit.